Mission, Vision, and Values
About the Office
Death Penalty Department
Clemency and Schedule
Mitigation & Investigation
Wrongful Conviction Project
Policy & Outreach
Policy & Outreach
Forensic Training Unit
OPD Training Materials
Attorney Billing Program
Welcome To The Library
Pro Se Resources
Criminal Law Casebook
Immigration Reference Guide
Immigration Relief Chart
Initial Interview Form
Immigration Defense Project's Know Your Rights Materials
Contact the Office
Contact our Staff
Criminal Law Casebook
Franklin County Criminal Law Casebook
Reproduced with permission from:
Timothy E. Pierce
Franklin County Public Defender Office
Criminal Rule 5 -- Initial Appearance, Preliminary Hearing.
Revised Code Chapter 2937
-- Preliminary Examination; Bail.
-- Preliminary hearing must be within ten consecutive days if defendant is held, fifteen consecutive day if not in custody.
State v. McCoy
, 188 Ohio App. 3d 152,
– Defendant’s complaints included lack of counsel at the preliminary hearing and an inadequate response when he asked for new counsel as trial was about to begin. (1) Defendant’s failure to provide a transcript of the preliminary hearing limits review, but even if a transcript were available the defendant has failed to demonstrate prejudice. No motion seeking relief was filed in the trial court before the defendant’s mid-trial entry of a no contest plea. See concurring opinion for a superior analysis. (2) Defendant has failed to overcome the suggestion of bad faith when a request for new counsel is made just before trial.
State v. Mosti
, Jefferson App. No. 02 JE 44,
-- The remedy when a preliminary hearing has not been recorded is for the Common Pleas Court to order a new preliminary hearing. It was error for the court to dismiss charges without prejudice.
State v. Washington
(1986), 30 Ohio App. 3d 98 -- Headnote: "A finding of probable cause by the court conducting the preliminary hearing is not appealable, and it is reversible error for the court of common pleas to dismiss the indictment base upon its disagreement with the municipal court's finding of probable cause. (Crim. R. 5[B] and
State v. Parrott
(1971), 27 Ohio St. 2d 205 -- The right to counsel attaches at preliminary hearing. Denial of that right invalidates a subsequent conviction unless the error was harmless (beyond a reasonable doubt). Also see
State v. Withers
(1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 53;
Coleman v. Alabama
(1970), 399 U.S. 1.
State v. Spates
(1992), 64 Ohio St. 3d 269 -- Paragraph two of the syllabus: "A defendant's plea of guilty entered into knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily after a preliminary hearing waives defendant's right to challenge a claimed deprivation of the right to counsel at the preliminary hearing stage of a criminal proceeding. (
Tollett v. Henderson
, 411 U.S. 258, 267..., followed.)"
State v. Mitchell
(1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 447 -- A motion to suppress evidence does not lie at the preliminary hearing.
State v. Nelson
(1977), 51 Ohio App. 2d 31 -- A preliminary hearing does not place the defendant in jeopardy. If the court determines that there is not probable cause to bind a defendant over on a felony charge, but is probable cause to believe he committed a misdemeanor, the court may not proceed to dispose of the misdemeanor without causing a complaint to be filed. Thus, a plea to a misdemeanor, without a complaint, is unauthorized and jeopardy does not bar subsequent prosecution for the original felony. (Decision may be subject to challenge.) Also see
State v. Kenney
(1975), 74 Ohio Ops. 2d 352.
State v. Pugh
(1978), 53 Ohio St. 2d 153 -- Without elaborating, Supreme Court affirms court of appeals holding that failure to accord a preliminary hearing within the prescribed time does not entitle the defendant to the dismissal of any indictment which follows.
State v. Morris
(1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 307 -- Paragraph three of the syllabus: "There is no constitutional right to a preliminary hearing under
, once an indictment has been returned by a grand jury, and, absent a showing by a defendant of particularized need for the inspection of grand jury minutes, such latter relief is not required." Also see
State v. Lamp
(1977), 59 Ohio App. 2d 125, 126-127.
State v. Wood
(1976), 48 Ohio App. 2d 339 -- There is no constitutional right to a preliminary hearing. If the defendant does not seek a remedy for the failure to afford a preliminary hearing before he is indicted, no relief is due. Also see
State v. Grim
(1975), 44 Ohio App. 2d 152.
State v. Martin
(1978), 56 Ohio St. 2d 289 -- Paragraph two of the syllabus: "When, at the request of defendant's counsel, a judge extends the time for a preliminary hearing pursuant to Crim. R. 5(B)(1), this continuance extends the time the defendant is required to be brought to both a preliminary hearing and trial pursuant to
Styer v. Brichta
(1990), 69 Ohio App. 3d 738 -- Habeas corpus lies where accused has not been afforded a preliminary hearing within the time specified by
El Vocero de Puerto Rico v. Puerto Rico
(1993), 508 U.S. 147 -- Probable cause hearings, which are the equivalent of preliminary hearings under the Puerto Rico Rules of Criminal Procedure, must be open to the public.
State v. Ferguson
(1979), 64 Ohio App. 2d 165 -- Dismissal of indictment as a sanction for preliminary hearing transcript being "unavailable" was premature without consideration of alternative remedies.
State v. Ratcliff
(1994), 95 Ohio App. 3d 199, 203 -- Though not elaborating, court says it finds no error in judge having based decision on a motion to suppress both on the evidence produced at the suppression hearing and on what he previously heard at a preliminary hearing in the same case, conducted before him, and where the same witnesses testified.
State v. Howell
(1994), 64 Ohio Misc. 2d 23 -- The standard for probable cause at a preliminary hearing is whether there is sufficient credible evidence to believe that the defendant committed the offense.
Timothy E. Pierce
Copyright © Franklin County Public Defender and Timothy E. Pierce, 2015
Contents may not be duplicated without express permission.