|
1. |
Q. |
What is the effective date of the new fee? |
|
|
A. |
The
original law was codified as Ohio
Revised Code Section 120.36, and became effective
September 29, 2005. The
law was subsequently amended in by H.B. 530 the budget
correction bill. The
amendments included in H.B. 530 became effective July 1,
2006. The text
of the application fee law, as amended by H.B. 530 is
available on the Ohio
Public Defender Web Site. |
|
2. |
Q. |
What
is the purpose of the $25.00 Fee? |
|
|
A. |
The
fee was created as a way to generate revenue for providing
indigent defense services and, along with recoupment
programs, to address the issue of clients contributing to
the cost of their defense.
Eighty percent of the funds collected are retained by
the county and are to be used to offset the cost of
providing indigent defense representation.
Twenty percent is remitted to the Ohio Public
Defender, and are used for the operations of the Office of
the Ohio Public Defender.
Ohio is now among about 20 other states that use
up-front indigent application fees. |
|
3. |
Q. |
Who
does the client (i.e., the indigent person) pay? |
|
|
A. |
The
client pays the clerk of court of the court that assessed
the fee. |
|
4. |
Q. |
At
what point is the fee assessed? |
|
|
A. |
The
individual becomes subject to assessment of the fee upon
submitting a Financial
Disclosure/Affidavit of Indigency Form to
the court, the public defender, the appointed attorney or
any other party who will make a determination regarding the
person’s indigency. If
the individual claims indigency, requests counsel, but
withdraws their request prior to filing the affidavit of
indigency, no fee should be assessed.
If
a person becomes indigent while the case is pending, or
returns to the court to request a public defender subsequent
to having retained, (or attempting to retain) private
counsel, they should complete an affidavit of indigency, and
the fee should be assessed at that time. |
|
5. |
Q. |
If
a person files a financial disclosure form, and is found
not-indigent, do they still owe the fee? |
|
|
A. |
Yes.
This is an application fee and it applies to all
persons who request or receive counsel, not just those who
are ultimately found to be indigent.
The point of assessment is described in number (4)
above. |
|
6. |
Q. |
Where
should the money be remitted? |
|
|
A. |
The
clerk of court remits all (100 percent) of the funds
collected to the county treasurer.
By the last day of each month, the county auditor
remits 20 percent of the funds collected in the previous
month to the State Public Defender. The Monthly
Auditor Remittance Forms and Instructions are available
on the OPD’s web site at www.opd.ohio.gov. |
|
7. |
Q. |
The
law says to charge one fee per case.
What is the definition of “per case?” |
|
|
A. |
“Case”
is defined in R.C. 120.36(A)(7) and is as follows:
“…For
purposes of assessing the application fee, a case means one
complete proceeding or trial held in one court for a person
on an indictment, information, complaint, petition,
citation, writ, motion, or other document initiating a case
that arises out of a single incident or a series of related
incidents, or when one individual is charged with two or
more offenses that the court handles
simultaneously….”
Accordingly,
the fee is independent from the number of case numbers
assigned by the clerk. |
|
8. |
Q. |
Does
the fee apply to municipal ordinance violations? |
|
|
A. |
Yes.
R.C. 120.36(A)(2) includes violations of violations of
municipal ordinances for which the potential penalty
includes loss of liberty. |
|
9. |
Q. |
In
municipal ordinance violations, how is the $25.00
distributed? |
|
|
A. |
The
cost of providing representation in ORC offenses is the
responsibility of the county.
The cost of providing representation in municipal
ordinance violations is the responsibility of the
municipality. Municipalities
that wish to receive reimbursement from the state for
providing representation in municipal ordinance cases must
contract with the county commissioners [R.C.
120.33(A)(4)] and/or the county public defender
commission [120.14(E)].
(Model contracts for this arrangement are available from the
Office of the Ohio Public Defender.)
All
money collected by the clerk of court must be remitted to
the County Treasurer. The
sharing of the $25.00 fee for municipal ordinance cases
should be handled in the same manner as the sharing of state
reimbursement for these cases.
With regard to sharing the $25.00 fee, the terms of
the negotiated contract can provide for the county to return
a share of these funds to the city or village. |
|
10. |
Q. |
Is
there a form letter or notice to give to clients regarding
this new fee? |
|
|
A. |
Yes,
a suggested Client
Information Sheet is available on the OPD’s web site
at www.opd.ohio.gov.
Local authorities are encouraged to distribute
this sheet with the financial disclosure/affidavit of
indigency form and to post the notice in courts and areas
where clients will be screened for indigency. |
|
11. |
Q. |
Which
courts are affected? |
|
|
A. |
Any
court where a person may request and be entitled to counsel
for a criminal or juvenile matter.
This includes Common Pleas, County, Municipal,
Juvenile, Probate, and Domestic Relations courts.
In Probate and Domestic courts, the application fee
is effective only for only
contempt charges where the court may impose a term of
imprisonment. |
|
12. |
Q. |
When
do the clerks remit the money to the county treasurer? |
|
|
A. |
The
clerks can remit the funds no less than monthly.
At their discretion, clerks may remit the funds
daily, weekly, bi-weekly, or on any other schedule so long
as it is remitted at least once per month. |
|
13. |
Q. |
Does
this affect or negate recoupment programs? |
|
|
A. |
No.
The application fee is independent from recoupment,
contribution, partial payment, and marginally indigent
programs. It
is also independent from instances where persons are ordered
to pay a portion of their defense costs pursuant to R.C.
2941.51(D). Such
costs may be assessed in addition to the the $25.00
application fee. |
|
14. |
Q. |
When
do the reporting requirements for the clerk of court take
effect? |
|
|
A. |
The
changes in H.B. 530 enacted new reporting requirements for
the Clerk of Court. Beginning
February 20, 2007, clerks must begin reporting monthly.
By the 20th day of each month, Clerks are
to remit a report for the previous month’s information.
Also, on February 20, 2007, a single report covering
the information for calendar year 2006 is due to the State
Public Defender. Clerks
who have already voluntarily reported monthly for the entire
year of 2006 do not need to also file an annual report.
Clerks
must use the Clerk of Court Indigent Application Fee
Reporting Form. Clerks
may use either the original
form or the revised
form to report monthly.
The revised form includes data for bindover/transfer
cases and uncollectible write-offs. |
|
15. |
Q. |
Is
the Financial Disclosure Form being updated to reflect the
new law? |
|
|
A. |
Yes
A new Financial
Disclosure Form/Affidavit of Indigency has been issued
in conjunction with the implementation of the new fee. |
|
16. |
Q. |
Can
the fee be assessed at the end of each case instead of
up-front? |
|
|
A. |
Unlike
other costs and fines, the application fee is intended to be
collected up-front, prior to or simultaneous with the
commencement of representation for the indigent person.
Assessing the fee at the end of the case negates the
benefit of the up-front collection.
The provision in the revised code regarding assessing
the fee at the end of the case was done only as a way of
dealing with those persons who did not pay the fee within
the seven day initial period.
It was not intended as the primary method of
collection. |
|
17. |
Q. |
When
can the fee be waived? |
|
|
A. |
The
court has the discretion to waive the fee any time it
determines that the individual lacks the financial resources
to pay the fee or if payment of the fee would result in an
undue hardship on the individual.
This can occur at the time of assessment, while the
case is pending, or after the case has concluded.
R.C. 120.36(C) prohibits blanket waivers of all cases
by a court. Cases
may be waived on a case-by-case basis only. |
|
18. |
Q. |
Is
there a model or suggested motion for waiver of the fee? |
|
|
A. |
The
Ohio Public Defender has provided model motions the clients
and/or the client’s attorneys may complete and file with
the court requesting the fee be waived or reduced.
One is a full motion, the other a modified and
abbreviated motion similar in format to the attorney Motion,
Entry and Certification form. It
is up to the local court to determine which format is
acceptable. Model
motions for waiver of the $25.00 fee are available on
the OPD’s web site. |
|
20. |
Q. |
How
do clerks of courts handle and report cases that originate
in Municipal or County Court and are bound over to Common
Pleas (or higher) Court? |
|
|
A. |
The
fee should be assessed in the court where the case is
initially filed. For
felonies in municipal or county court, the municipal court
should assess the fee. If
the case is bound over or transferred from one court to
another, and the application fee has not been paid, the
court that initially assessed the fee shall remove the
assessment, and the court to which the case is transferred
shall assess the fee. |
|
21. |
Q. |
The
law says the County Auditor must remit 20 percent of the
funds to the State Public Defender each month. What is the
deadline/timetable for this? |
|
|
A. |
R.C.
120.36(D) indicates that no later than the last day of each
month, county auditors shall remit 20 percent of the funds
collected in the previous month to the State Public
Defender. For example, by January 31, 2006, the county
auditor should remit all funds collected in December 2005. |
|
22. |
Q. |
Who
is the payee for the check/warrant from the County Auditor
to the State Public Defender? |
|
|
A. |
The
check or warrant from the County Auditor to the State Public
Defender may be made out to either “Ohio Public
Defender” or “Treasurer-State of Ohio.”
The important factor is that County Auditor send the
check to the Office of the Ohio Public Defender, not
the State Treasurer.
For
convenience, and to avoid confusion, we recommend the payee
on the check read “Ohio Public Defender.”
That way the payee matches up with where the check is
being sent. |
|
23. |
Q. |
When
a child has been appointed a GAL/attorney,
is the child assessed the application fee? |
|
|
A. |
If
charged with unruly,
delinquency or juvenile traffic offense, then yes.
Do not charge again for the Guardian Ad Litem
appointment. Also,
do not assess an application fee for a child who is
alleged to be or has been adjudicated abused, neglected,
and/or dependent where the child’s GAL is appointed as
counsel. In an
abuse/dependency/neglect case and the GAL is not an attorney
but there is a need for an attorney to represent the child,
do not assess the child an application fee for said
attorney. |
|
24. |
Q. |
How
are community control violations (formerly probation
violations) handled? |
|
|
A. |
R.C. 120.36(A)(5)(a) outlines the provisions for assessing the
application fee in a probation (community control)
violation. If a
person is charged with a probation violation, it should be
considered a separate course of conduct, and therefore
subject to assessment of the $25.00 fee.
However, persons committing PV’s should not be
charged double if the conduct that resulted in the PV also
becomes a new or separate case.
For example, if a person is violated for testing
positive for drug use, but is not charged with a drug abuse
offense, then they would be assessed a $25.00 for the PV.
If they are also charged with a drug abuse offense,
they would be assessed a $25.00 for the drug abuse case, but
not the PV. Charging
them for both would essentially make them pay double for the
same action or course of conduct. |