|
Press
Release 12/31/03
Ohio’s Execution Procedures Not Fit for a Dog
Today the Office of the Ohio Public Defender
filed a Complaint in the Federal District Court for the Southern
District of Ohio under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging the violation
of constitutional rights of two death-row inmates. Plaintiff Lewis
Williams Jr. is scheduled to be executed on January 14, 2004, and
Plaintiff John Glenn Roe is scheduled to be executed on February
3, 2004. The litigation brought on their behalf seeks to suspend
the executions.
The Complaint alleges that Ohio’s lethal
injection protocol violates the inmates’constitutional rights by
executing them with drugs that include a paralyzing agent
veterinarians will not use for the euthanasia of cats and dogs.
This paralyzing drug casts a chemical veil over the excruciatingly
painful effects of death by suffocation and heart attack. Ohio’s
lethal injection protocol includes an unreliable ultrashort-acting
anesthetic that can leave the condemned inmate conscious but
trapped in a paralyzed body wracked with the pain of suffocation
and a heart attack.
The inmates seek a preliminary and permanent
injunction preventing the state from executing them by the means
currently employed for carrying out an execution by lethal
injection in the state of Ohio—the only method of execution used
in Ohio. This method of execution violates the Eighth and
Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, which
prohibits the infliction of cruel and unusual punishment.
Ohio’s lethal injection protocol involves
administering three drugs: thiopental sodium, pancuronium bromide
(paralyzing agent), and potassium chloride.
Mark J.S. Heath of New York, a medical doctor
board certified in anesthesiology, maintains that "Ohio’s
lethal injection protocol creates an unacceptable risk that the
inmate will not be anesthetized to the point of being unconscious
and unaware of pain for the duration of the execution procedure.
If the inmate is not first successfully anesthetized . . . the
pancuronium will paralyze all voluntary muscles and mask external,
physical indications of the excruciating pain being experienced by
the inmate during the process of suffocating (caused by the
pancuronium) and having a cardiac arrest (caused by the potassium
chloride)."
Dr. Heath’s opinion is corroborated by the
experience of Carol Weihrer. According to Weiher’s affidavit,
she underwent eye surgery. The sedative she received was
ineffectual and left her conscious during the entire
surgery. Because of the administration of a neuromuscular
blocking agent like pancuronium bromide, however, she was unable
to indicate her consciousness and horrific pain to the doctor
removing her eyeball for surgical repair: "I therefore
experienced what has come to be known as Anesthesia Awareness, in
which I was able to think lucidly, hear, perceive and feel
everything that was going on during the surgery, but I was unable
to move. It burnt like the fires of hell. It was the most
terrifying, torturous experience you can imagine. The experience
was worse than death."
Furthermore, the Complaint alleges, the state
fails to provide rational, reliable directions or standards for
the requisite training, education, and expertise of the personnel
who carry out executions by lethal injection.
Click
here for a copy of relevant pleadings posted on the Ohio Public
Defender website.
FOR
MORE INFORMATION:
Wendi Dotson
Office of the Ohio
Public Defender
Telephone: (614)
644-1613
Fax: (614) 644-0703
E-mail: Wendi.Dotson@opd.state.oh.us
|