Safecracking

 

Franklin County Criminal Law Casebook

Reproduced with permission from:
David L. Strait and the Franklin County Public Defender Office
 

R.C. 2911.31 -- Safecracking.
 
State v. Perkins (1994), 93 Ohio App. 3d 672 -- The combination to a safe constitutes property for purposes of establishing a theft offense.
 
State v. Gover (1990), 67 Ohio App. 3d 384 -- "Smackwater Jack's" restaurant used a vault as a private dining area. Inside the vault was a small safe with trinkets on display inside and closed off by a plexiglas cover. Defendant was convicted of safecracking for having broken the cover and removing trinkets. Reversed.
 
State v. Snowden (1976), 49 Ohio App. 2d 7, 13-14 -- Similar acts evidence relating to theft is immaterial in a prosecution for safecracking.
 
State v. Carroll (1984), 14 Ohio App. 3d 51 -- The offenses of breaking and entering and safecracking do not merge for purposes of sentencing.
 
Ohio Attorney General's Opinion No. 84-040 -- The safecracking statute does not apply to the insertion of a stolen credit card into an automatic teller device. Also see State v. Stotridge, Ross County Court of Appeals No. 1982-63 -- Safecracking statute does not apply to prying open a cash register.
 

Publishing Information

Published by David L. Strait
 
Copyright © Franklin County Public Defender and David L. Strait, 2015
 
Contents may not be duplicated without express permission.

OFFICE OF THE OHIO PUBLIC DEFENDER

  250 EAST BROAD STREET
SUITE 1400
COLUMBUS, OHIO 43215
(614) 466-5394
(800) 686-1573